Chased this at the North Area Committee. Incensed that they tried to cut the public-questions section short and I had to heckle to get this heard. Turns out that our local democracy really is struggling, if you're not a geriatric belly-aching about non-resident parking I don't think they want to hear. Anway, raised it there, and that will probably achieve nothing.
This is a copy of an email I've just sent the elected Mayor:
I contacted you via. Twitter, as you're our new mayor, to discuss a problem I've had with City Deal.
You may be aware that we're getting some long-overdue upgrades on Arbury Road in North Cambridge. With any luck we'll eventually get a cycle route all the way down Arbury Road so people living in, say, Histon or Orchard Park will be able to ride to work at places like the Beehive Centre. We sorely need this, and I'm supportive of each part as long as we're working towards a cohesive whole (i.e. a route on the whole length of the road). I rather fear we'll end up with a good facility down half the length of the road, one that'll look good but hardly be used because it doesn't connect to anywhere. But thats another story.
Stage 1 has already been completed, and we're in the middle of stage 2. When the consultation stage of that happened, the proposal was that the hedge by Arbury Road would be 'reduced'. When the project kicked off in March, we were given just a couple of days notice that this would not be the case - the hedge would be removed in its entirety.
Now before going further I should stress that while this hedge wasn't one of the hedges that gave Kings Hedges its name it was still an old structure. Arbury Road is the oldest street name in Cambridge, and there were species present in the hedge indicative that it pre-dated the housing estate by some time - the presence of greengages in the hedge (which were grown in this area commercially before the 1960's) was one indicator, but the overall diversity of undergrowth plants was a clear measure that this hedge was historic. When I contacted City Deal about this, I calmly discussed with them what could be done to instead retain some biodiversity and restore the damage when the hedge was grubbed up and re-planted a little to the left (which was their plan). They initially seemed enthusiastic about this, to discuss what should be re-planted to retain local hedging culture, wildlife, and overall biodiversity, but it soon became apparent that they'd already bought more plants and that the discussion they were having was purely to try to appease me - they didn't meaningfully consult on the plants or replanting. My goal was to get a better planting scheme. Their goal was to make me believe I was being listened to while not changing a single part of any plan they had.
They claimed that the rush to get the job done at the end of March was to get the planting done before the end of the season. In truth, Spring had already come to Cambridge and this job was done too late. They claimed they were missing out sections of hedge where there were birds nesting already - by my estimation they came to within about 2m of nesting blackbirds with chainsaws and chippers. Needless to say those birds abandoned the nest. I think the rush came because they were in a hurry to spend money before the end of the financial year - the decision they took to cut and replace a hedge at the end of March makes no arboricultural or ecological sense.
I should stress that a mature hedgerow isn't just the trees, and that hedging isn't the same across the country (or even just this county). They're practical structures, and hedging custom across the UK has evolved differently with very good reason - what thrives is not the same in Cumbria and Kent! What we've got-replanted is a generic British mix, with numerous species that are entirely inappropriate for Cambridge. Dogwood, for example, can grow here but is a poor barrier species in our conditions. Spindle is in the mix, and it plays no part in local hedging culture. Alder buckthorn is in it too - its a tree that likes its toes wet, and when they stop watering the new plants it'll soon be out-competed. I certainly wouldn't plant any of these bright-berried toxic species right by a school in large numbers (and yes, they have).
But trees are only part of the full diversity of a hedge - and the City Deal have done their best to destroy any hope of the rest of the biodiversity of the hedge recovering. They've put down a mulch of wood-chips so the only undergrowth plants recovering are those with ineradicable root stocks. So rather than having a very varied habitat with multiple species, we're primarily seeing the site choked by bindweed, cow parsley and few others.
To make absolutely sure that the site is as wildlife hostile as possible they installed a wire fence with gaps at the bottom smaller than an adullt hedgehog. Its hard to envisage anything more stupid than that.
Now Kings Hedges hasn't got the busybody population that Milton Road has - the latter has a large, retired population who've owned their own homes for a long time and who know how to mobilise and badger for what they want. Kings Hedges doesn't - and City Deal took full advantage of that in cutting corners in their consultation. The idea that the hedge (an old boundary) was to be removed entirely wasn't in the consultation. City Deal staff insisted that they have consulted with hedge experts at the City Council but when I asked the City Council officer responsible for trees about their hedging expertise he told me that on the subject of native hedging, they don't have such expertise.
The amount of damage done to the local environment by this has been colossal - but by hand-weeding and re-planting appropriate native plants (ideally sourced locally to retain local biodiversity) through the very damaging wood-chip mulch (which will itself ensure that any seeds surviving in the soil can't re-emerge as new plants, thats precisely what the mulch is for) we could still, perhaps, rescue something from a scheme which has been executed so very, very badly. The wire mesh blocking hedgehogs from the hedge urgently needs replacing with a simple wire fence that doesn't block wildlife. And owing to the wrong choice of plants being put in we need a much longer term commitment to replacing with more appropriate plants (specifically a mix with far more hawthorn, some elder and dog-rose) over the coming years. The degree to which the wrong plants have been tended this year means, I fear, we're looking at a much slowed death spiral.
I would rather hope you might lean on City Deal over this. If we're going to have ever more such projects going forward then messing up perfectly simple projects like this in a mad dash to get the wrong plants put in, at the wrong time, in the wrong way, is something we need to avoid of City Deal is to regain any trust locally. I'm aware they're trying to re-brand because they've got bad name already - perhaps fixing this could be something of an olive branch?
Saturday 17 June 2017
There are times when its really hard to know how to start a blog post.
This is not one of them. The stupid is strong here, I don't have to qualify any statements with anything
Greater Cambridge City Deal, have pissed away about half a million quid on consultations, consultants, visulisations and modelling for upgrading Milton Road. The models, incidentally, don't include cyclists except as an inconvenience that might slow cars down. The result of this comical ineptitude (in a city where half of the people here cycle) is that plans for what to do for cycling on Milton Road vary from inconvenient to actively dangerous. Oh, and part of the brief for councillors and attendees at meetings with the consultants who came out with this crap is that no one disses the consultants. Yeah, thats right, despite the fact they've taken heaps of cash for producing something crap, you're not allowed to go to meetings and tell them that this is shit.
I'm not even kidding. I'm not even exaggerating,
Here's the PDF of their presentation thing, only click on it if you want to download pages of bumf as well as useful images.
But just look at this crap.
Seriously? Trees aren't lollipops with narrow stick like trunks and neat canopies, growing happily through tarmac with no earth around them and no roots growing outwards, ever. The cycle-lane seems to be an undulator, presumably going up, and down, up, and down with each driveway - and thats going on on the other side of the road there? Looks narrower than I am.
Bugger it, I was going to go through several of the junctions and say why they're on the whole not good enough for cycling (so not good enough to encourage anyone out of their cars and on to bikes) but I can't be arsed. Short version - if you don't consider cyclists valid road users, which would be the only reason not to be abundantly apologetic for presenting a shit model that excludes us, then you won't get junction design right for cycling. There aren't real Dutch roundabouts among the more favoured plans and we're seeing a variety of cycle lanes from well protected segregated through to shared use, rather than a single, useful, straight forward, segregated route in each direction. Lessons from Hills Road haven't been learned, what we're looking at is, as a whole, crap. And we're paying through the nose for this crap to be drawn, re-drawn, and re-drawn again.
City Deal has proved itself unable to deliver landscaping as part of a road regeneration scheme. They see landscaping as something to do a bodge job at the end, they don't care for local ecology, aesthetics or planting culture and they take an extremely broad view of what consultation questions can be stretched to mean. If we're going to get Milton Road not only made safer for cycling but more efficient for all road users and landscaped such that it isn't visibly an urban motorway, is we want an interesting and diverse tree-scape rather than just whatever crap thats big enough that they can buy at the last minute we need to start looking to see what can be grown now. You want mature trees replanted? How many species of such do you think can be bought, in number, at the last minute? Oh, you haven't looked at that yet? Its almost too late already.
So I invite Milton Road Residents Association, Milton Road Alliance and whoever else gives a crap - do you want to get a good resolution that can be sold to all parties? Lets start talking about what tree species we want. Lets start now. I've got ideas on what trees could be used, and means to turn this into not only a great route for riding but a truly world class tree-scape.